James vs. Compaine

On page 56 James refutes Compaine’s argument that, "[A]doption of technologies such as television, radios, and telephones" will eventually lead to a closing of the natural gap.” Compaine compares the digital divide to the automobile gap that occurred in the past. That gap, which was significant and problematic in the past, cleared itself up. James argues Compaine underestimates the issues of the digital divide, and believes that the automobile and other technologies cannot be compared to the digital divide of today, because, for example, with the automobile, government spends money on public transit, and people live in places where cars may not be a necessity. This cannot be compared to people with or without the internet.

Compaine might reply by saying that James exaggerates his viewpoint. Compaine acknowledges the problems occurring because of the digital divide. However, when comparing developed countries to developing countries, the latter had issues far greater than closing the gap. “A society that has more important issues, such as feeding and housing its people and providing for safety and security, and creating a general well-being.” The digital divide is low on their list of priorities.